AI LLM Rest of World
The Logit Working Papers present a systematic diagnostic of contemporary health technology assessment beliefs, using AI large language models to interrogate the published literature, guidelines, and institutional practices of HTA agencies, journals, and academic centers. Each paper applies a fixed 24-item measurement instrument to assess whether foundational axioms of representational measurement are endorsed or rejected in practice. The results are reported as endorsement probabilities and normalized logits, providing a transparent, quantitative profile of how deeply false measurement is embedded in decision frameworks.
These papers are not opinion pieces. They are structured audits of belief systems that govern therapy evaluation, access, and pricing. By translating qualitative doctrine into probabilistic measurement diagnostics, the series exposes where arithmetic is routinely applied without measurement, where non-falsifiable constructs are treated as evidence, and where scientifically inadmissible claims are normalized. The purpose is corrective: to document the extent of measurement failure and to establish a replicable baseline against which reform can be evaluated.
ORGANIZATIONS
EUROPEAN UNION: EUNETHTA AND EU HTAR PROMISE A FUTURE OF FALSE MEASUREMENT
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO): ENDORSING MEASUREMENT FAILURE
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INTERNATIONAL (HTAi): ADVOCATING FALSE MEASUREMENT
JOURNALS
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (EJHE): ENDORSING MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
PHARMACOECONOMICS: THE FLAGSHIP JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (IJTAHC): PROMOTING FALSE MEASUREMENT ON A GLOBAL SCALE
AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA: A NATIONAL CONSENSUS ON THE ABSENCE OF MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
AUSTRALIA: PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PBAC) – DECISIONS WITHOUT MEASUREMENT
AUSTRALIA: DECONSTRUCTING THE EPISTEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE AUSTRALIAN AQoL
CANADA
CANADA: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
CANADA: ACADEMIC RESEARCH AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
CANADA: CADTH/CDA AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE
CANADA: QUEBEC AND THE REPRODUCTION OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
CANADA: HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INTERNATIONAL (HTAi) AND THE COMMITMENT TO FALSE MEASUREMENT
CANADA: DECONSTRUCTING THE EPISTEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE HUI INSTRUMENTS
JOURNAL
GENERAL
EPISTEMIC STRUCTURAL INVARIANCE IN THE FALSE MEASUREMENT STATUS OF NATIONAL MULTIATTRIBUTE INSTRUMENTS (77)
FINLAND
FINLAND: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (80)
FINLAND: FINCCHTA ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (81)
FINLAND: THE 15D INSTRUMENT AND THE STANDARDS OF REPRESENTATIONAL MEASUREMENT (82)
FINLAND: DECONSTRUCTING THE EPISTEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE 15D INSTRUMENT (83)
FRANCE WEBSITE CONTENT
FRANCE
FRANCE: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
FRANCE: THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE BY THE HAUTE AUTORITE DE SANTE
GERMANY
GERMANY: NATIONAL PROFILE AND THE FAILURE OF MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
ASSESSMENT
GERMANY: RESEARCH CENTERS AND THE FUTURE OF MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
ASSESSMENT
GERMANY: IQWIG?G-BA AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE
NEW ZEALAND
NEW ZEALAND: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT ABSENCE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
NEW ZEALAND: THE ABSENCE OF MEASUREMENT IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH GROUPS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOY ASSESSMENT