AI LLM Rest of World

The Logit Working Papers present a systematic diagnostic of contemporary health technology assessment beliefs, using AI large language models to interrogate the published literature, guidelines, and institutional practices of HTA agencies, journals, and academic centers. Each paper applies a fixed 24-item measurement instrument to assess whether foundational axioms of representational measurement are endorsed or rejected in practice. The results are reported as endorsement probabilities and normalized logits, providing a transparent, quantitative profile of how deeply false measurement is embedded in decision frameworks.

These papers are not opinion pieces. They are structured audits of belief systems that govern therapy evaluation, access, and pricing. By translating qualitative doctrine into probabilistic measurement diagnostics, the series exposes where arithmetic is routinely applied without measurement, where non-falsifiable constructs are treated as evidence, and where scientifically inadmissible claims are normalized. The purpose is corrective: to document the extent of measurement failure and to establish a replicable baseline against which reform can be evaluated.

ORGANIZATIONS

EUROPEAN UNION: EUNETHTA AND EU HTAR PROMISE A FUTURE OF FALSE MEASUREMENT
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO): ENDORSING MEASUREMENT FAILURE

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INTERNATIONAL (HTAi): ADVOCATING FALSE MEASUREMENT

JOURNALS

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (EJHE): ENDORSING MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
PHARMACOECONOMICS: THE FLAGSHIP JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (IJTAHC): PROMOTING FALSE MEASUREMENT ON A GLOBAL SCALE


AUSTRALIA


AUSTRALIA:  A NATIONAL CONSENSUS ON THE ABSENCE OF MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

AUSTRALIA: ACADEMIC RESEARCH CENTERS ENDORSE THE ABSENCE OF MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

AUSTRALIA: PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PBAC) – DECISIONS WITHOUT MEASUREMENT

AUSTRALIA: DECONSTRUCTING THE EPISTEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE AUSTRALIAN AQoL

AUSTRIA

AUSTRIA: NATIONAL DENIAL OF REPRESENTATIONAL MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

AUSTRIA: INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (AIHTA) AMD THE OPERATIONALIZING OF FALSE MEASUREMENT

AUSTRIA: THE AUSTRALIAN REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORITY DACHVERBAND DER SOZIALVERSICHERUNGSTRAGER AND THE INSTITUTIONALIZING OF MEASURE FAILURE

BELGIUM

BELGIUM: THE HEALTH CARE KNOWLEDGE CENTER AND MEASUREMENT AS NONSENSE ON STILTS

CANADA

CANADA: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

CANADA: ACADEMIC RESEARCH AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

CANADA: CADTH/CDA AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE

CANADA: QUEBEC AND THE REPRODUCTION OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

CANADA: HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INTERNATIONAL (HTAi) AND THE COMMITMENT TO FALSE MEASUREMENT

CANADA: DECONSTRUCTING THE EPISTEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE HUI INSTRUMENTS

JOURNAL

 CANADA: DECONSTRUCTING THE EPISTEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (IJTAHC)

CZECH REPUBLIC

CZECH REPUBLIC: THE NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

CZECH REPUBLIC: THE APPLICATION OF FALSE MEASUREMENT BY THE STATE INSTITUTE FOR DRUG CONTROL

DENMARK

DENMARK: NATIONAL REJECTION OF  REPRESENTATIONAL MEASUREMENT  IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

DENMARK: OPERATIONALIZING NONSENSE ON QALY STILTS – THE DANISH MEDICINES COUNCIL

DENMARK: OPERATIONALIZING NONSENSE ON QALY STILTS – THE DANISH MEDICINES AGENCY

ESTONIA

ESTONIA: THE NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

ESTONIA: THE ESTONIAN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND GUARANTEEING MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

EUROPEAN UNION

EUROPEAN UNION: THE EU ORDAINS  FALSE MEASUREMENT AS THE BASIS FOR MEMBER HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT WITH EUNetHTA AND EU HTA

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS:  INSTITUTIONALIZING FALSE MEASUREMENT

FINLAND

FINLAND: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

FINLAND: FINCCHTA ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

FINLAND: THE EPISTEMIC FAILURE OF THE FINNISH 15D INSTRUMENT

FRANCE

FRANCE: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 

FRANCE: ACADEMIC RESEARCH CENTERS AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

FRANCE: THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE BY THE HAUTE AUTORITE DE SANTE

GERMANY


GERMANY: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

GERMANY: ACADEMIC RESEARCH CENTERS AND THE ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

GERMANY: CONSTRAINED INSTITUTIONAL ENDORSEMENT  OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE BY IQWiG/G-BA

ITALY

ITALY: MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT COORDINATION

ITALY: MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION

IRELAND

IRELAND: THE UNCRITICAL OPERATIONAL INHERITANCE OF NICE FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

ISRAEL

ISRAEL: NATIONAL INSTITUTIONALIZATION  OF FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

ISRAEL: THE PUBLIC NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE  AND THE OPERATIONALIZATION OF FALSE MEASUREMENT  IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

LATVIA

LATVIA: THE NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

LATVIA: THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE OPERATIONALIZING FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

LITHUANIA

LITHUANIA: THE NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF FALSE MEASUREMENT  IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

LITHUANIA: THE STATE HEALTH INSURANCE FUND OPERATIONALIZING FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

NETHERLANDS

NETHERLANDS; THE DUTCH CONTRIBUTION TO NONSENSE ON STILTS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

NETHERLANDS:  MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

NETHERLANDS: MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN DUTCH ACADEMIC RESEARCH CENTERS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 


NEW ZEALAND

NEW ZEALAND: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT ABSENCE  IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

NEW ZEALAND: THE ABSENCE OF MEASUREMENT IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH GROUPS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

POLAND

POLAND: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

POLAND: AOTMiT ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY  ASSESSMENT

PORTUGAL

PORTUGAL: NATIONAL DIFFUSION OF FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEATH TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE BASE

PORTUGAL: INFARMED AND THE OPERATIONALIZING OF FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

SINGAPORE

SINGAPORE: THE AGENCY FOR CARE EFFECTIVENESS AND THE DENIAL OF  REPRESENTATIONAL MEASUREMENT

SPAIN

SPAIN: NATIONAL COORDINATION AND THE STRUCTURAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

SPAIN: REGIONAL VARIANTS OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

SWEDEN

SWEDEN: NATIONAL ENDORSEMENT OF MEASUREMENT FAILURE  

SWEDEN: TLV REJECTS REPRESENTATIONAL MEASUREMENT

SWITZERLAND

SWITZERLAND: NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF  FALSE MEASUREMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

SWITZERLAND: OPERATIONALIZING FALSE MEASUREMENT – THE FEDERAL OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH (BAG) AND THE INSTITUTIONALIZING OF THE QALY

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: ENDORSING MEASUREMENT FAILURE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE