AI LLM USA & UK

The Logit Working Papers present a systematic diagnostic of contemporary health technology assessment beliefs, using AI large language models to interrogate the published literature, guidelines, and institutional practices of HTA agencies, journals, and academic centers. Each paper applies a fixed 24-item measurement instrument to assess whether foundational axioms of representational measurement are endorsed or rejected in practice. The results are reported as endorsement probabilities and normalized logits, providing a transparent, quantitative profile of how deeply false measurement is embedded in decision frameworks.

These papers are not opinion pieces. They are structured audits of belief systems that govern therapy evaluation, access, and pricing. By translating qualitative doctrine into probabilistic measurement diagnostics, the series exposes where arithmetic is routinely applied without measurement, where non-falsifiable constructs are treated as evidence, and where scientifically inadmissible claims are normalized. The purpose is corrective: to document the extent of measurement failure and to establish a replicable baseline against which reform can be evaluated.

UNITED STATES

            ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW

            INSTITUTE FIR CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC REVIEW

            HEALTH SYSTEMS

            PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES

            JOURNALS

---

UNITED KINGDOM

            ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW

            NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

            OFFICE OF HEALTH ECONOMICS

ASSOCIATION OF THE BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

SCOTTISH MEDICINES CONSORTIUM

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES

JOURNALS